Racket comparison
Alkemia Tenebris 2026 vs Alkemia Vento 2026
The Alkemia Tenebris 2026 scores higher for power and control; the Alkemia Vento 2026 for rebound.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Tear
- Tear
- Weight
- 350 - 360 gr
- 350 - 360 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Hard
- Medium-Soft
- Core
- Black EVA PRO React
- Black EVA PRO React
- Faces
- Triple-layer 3K carbon fiber
- Double layer of 3K carbon fiber, medium-soft hardness
- Frame
- Kevlar + Carbon
- Kevlar + Carbon
- Catalogue rating
- 8.7/10
- 8.6/10
- Power
- 9.5/10
- 8.5/10
- Control
- 9.0/10
- 8.5/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.4/10
- 8.3/10
- Rebound
- 8.0/10
- 9.1/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.6/10
- 8.4/10
- Strengths
- Heavy, penetrating volleys
- Stable *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Violent, authoritative smash
- Salida de bola alta
- Defensa y transición fáciles
- Bandeja profunda con margen
- Tradeoffs
- Defensive depth needs work
- Late blocks feel demanding
- Limited help on off-center contact
- Menos pegada pura
- Smash sin explosividad
- Bloqueo más amortiguado
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Alkemia Tenebris 2026 if you value power and control: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.5 vs 8.5, control 9.0 vs 8.5).
- Choose the Alkemia Vento 2026 if you value rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (rebound 9.1 vs 8.0).
- The Alkemia Vento 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Alkemia Tenebris 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.

