Racket comparison
Joma Pro Slam 2.0 Negro-Turquesa 2025 vs Joma Tournament Flex Negro-Rojo 2025
The Joma Pro Slam 2.0 Negro-Turquesa 2025 scores higher for power and control; the Joma Tournament Flex Negro-Rojo 2025 for manoeuvrability, rebound and sweet spot.
- Season
- 2025
- 2025
- Shape
- Diamond
- Tear
- Weight
- 355 - 365 gr
- 355 - 365 gr
- Touch
- Medium
- Medium-Soft
- Core
- Black EVA
- Black EVA
- Faces
- 3K Carbon Fiber
- Fiberglass
- Frame
- 100% Carbon
- Fiberglass
- Catalogue rating
- 8.4/10
- 8.3/10
- Power
- 9.1/10
- 7.0/10
- Control
- 9.0/10
- 8.5/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 7.3/10
- 8.5/10
- Rebound
- 8.7/10
- 9.1/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.1/10
- 8.6/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Joma Pro Slam 2.0 Negro-Turquesa 2025 if you value power and control: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.1 vs 7.0, control 9.0 vs 8.5).
- Choose the Joma Tournament Flex Negro-Rojo 2025 if you value manoeuvrability, rebound and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.5 vs 7.3, rebound 9.1 vs 8.7, sweet spot 8.6 vs 8.1).
- The Joma Pro Slam 2.0 Negro-Turquesa 2025 has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique; the Joma Tournament Flex Negro-Rojo 2025 has a teardrop head, which usually balances power and control.
- The Joma Tournament Flex Negro-Rojo 2025 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Joma Pro Slam 2.0 Negro-Turquesa 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.