ZARVO

Racket comparison

Kombat Arenal 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Etna 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026

The Kombat Arenal 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 scores higher for manoeuvrability and rebound; the Kombat Etna 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 for power and control.

Season
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Weight
350 - 360 gr
350 - 370 gr
Touch
Medium
Hard
Core
High-recovery Black EVA
Black EVA Pro
Faces
18K carbon
12K Carbon
Frame
Carbon fiber
Carbon fiber
Catalogue rating
7.7/10
7.9/10
Power
7.9/10
9.3/10
Control
7.9/10
8.5/10
Manoeuvrability
7.9/10
7.6/10
Rebound
7.5/10
6.3/10
Sweet spot
7.4/10
7.7/10
Strengths
  • Clear volley punch
  • Solid *bandeja* stability
  • Good ball output
  • Smash power and leverage
  • Strong volleys at net
  • Clean *bandeja* and *víbora*
Tradeoffs
  • Compact sweet spot
  • Defense needs early prep
  • Low balls feel demanding
  • Defense needs quick preparation
  • Low balls lack easy exit
  • Forgiveness limited on mishits

Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.

Which suits whom

  • Choose the Kombat Arenal 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 if you value manoeuvrability and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 7.9 vs 7.6, rebound 7.5 vs 6.3).
  • Choose the Kombat Etna 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 if you value power and control: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.3 vs 7.9, control 8.5 vs 7.9).
  • The Kombat Arenal 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has the softer touch (Medium vs Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Kombat Etna 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
  • The Kombat Arenal 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has the lighter listed weight (350 - 360 gr vs 350 - 370 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.

More comparisons