Racket comparison
Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Osorno 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026
The Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 scores higher for control; the Kombat Osorno 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 for power and rebound.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Tear
- Tear
- Weight
- 360 - 370 gr
- 360 - 370 gr
- Touch
- Medium
- Medium-Soft
- Core
- Red EVA
- Double-density EVA
- Faces
- 18K carbon
- 18K carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 7.7/10
- 7.9/10
- Power
- 6.4/10
- 7.2/10
- Control
- 8.5/10
- 8.0/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.0/10
- 8.2/10
- Rebound
- 7.6/10
- 8.1/10
- Sweet spot
- 7.8/10
- 8.1/10
- Strengths
- Baseline control and depth
- Easy handling in transitions
- Reliable *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Very maneuverable in defense
- Generous sweet spot
- Controlled *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Tradeoffs
- Not built for violent smashes
- Needs clean contact under pressure
- Less forgiving for soft-racket users
- Limited explosive smash power
- Overheads favor placement
- Not for violent attacking
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 if you value control: its catalogue scores are higher (control 8.5 vs 8.0).
- Choose the Kombat Osorno 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 if you value power and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (power 7.2 vs 6.4, rebound 8.1 vs 7.6).
- The Kombat Osorno 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.