Racket comparison
Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 vs Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger
The Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 scores higher for manoeuvrability and sweet spot; the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger for power and rebound.
- Season
- 2025
- 2025
- Shape
- Round
- Diamond
- Weight
- 360 - 375 gr
- 360 - 375 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Hard
- Medium
- Core
- EV50
- HR3
- Faces
- Carbon Alum 12K
- 12K Carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 8.4/10
- 8.4/10
- Power
- 8.5/10
- 9.6/10
- Control
- 8.6/10
- 8.4/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.9/10
- 8.1/10
- Rebound
- 7.5/10
- 8.2/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.5/10
- 7.6/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 if you value manoeuvrability and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.9 vs 8.1, sweet spot 8.5 vs 7.6).
- Choose the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger if you value power and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.6 vs 8.5, rebound 8.2 vs 7.5).
- The Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 has a round head, which usually keeps the balance low for control and a forgiving sweet spot; the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique.
- The Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger has the softer touch (Medium vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.

