ZARVO

Racket comparison

Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 vs Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger

The Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 scores higher for manoeuvrability and sweet spot; the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger for power and rebound.

Season
2025
2025
Shape
Round
Diamond
Weight
360 - 375 gr
360 - 375 gr
Touch
Medium-Hard
Medium
Core
EV50
HR3
Faces
Carbon Alum 12K
12K Carbon
Frame
Carbon fiber
Carbon fiber
Catalogue rating
8.4/10
8.4/10
Power
8.5/10
9.6/10
Control
8.6/10
8.4/10
Manoeuvrability
8.9/10
8.1/10
Rebound
7.5/10
8.2/10
Sweet spot
8.5/10
7.6/10
Strengths
No strengths recorded yet.
No strengths recorded yet.
Tradeoffs
No tradeoffs recorded yet.
No tradeoffs recorded yet.

Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.

Which suits whom

  • Choose the Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 if you value manoeuvrability and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.9 vs 8.1, sweet spot 8.5 vs 7.6).
  • Choose the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger if you value power and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.6 vs 8.5, rebound 8.2 vs 7.5).
  • The Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 has a round head, which usually keeps the balance low for control and a forgiving sweet spot; the Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique.
  • The Nox LA10 Quantum 12K 2025 Leo Augsburger has the softer touch (Medium vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Nox Future Control 12K Alum 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.

More comparisons