Racket comparison
Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum 2025 vs Nox Quantum 12K Carbon 2025
The Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum 2025 scores higher for manoeuvrability and sweet spot; the Nox Quantum 12K Carbon 2025 for power and rebound.
- Season
- 2025
- 2025
- Shape
- Tear
- Diamond
- Weight
- 360 - 375 gr
- 360 - 375 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Hard
- Medium
- Core
- EV50
- EVA HR3
- Faces
- Carbon Alum 12K
- 12K carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 8.3/10
- 8.3/10
- Power
- 9.0/10
- 9.3/10
- Control
- 7.9/10
- 7.9/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.4/10
- 7.9/10
- Rebound
- 7.6/10
- 8.6/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.4/10
- 7.8/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum 2025 if you value manoeuvrability and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.4 vs 7.9, sweet spot 8.4 vs 7.8).
- Choose the Nox Quantum 12K Carbon 2025 if you value power and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (power 9.3 vs 9.0, rebound 8.6 vs 7.6).
- The Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum 2025 has a teardrop head, which usually balances power and control; the Nox Quantum 12K Carbon 2025 has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique.
- The Nox Quantum 12K Carbon 2025 has the softer touch (Medium vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.