Racket comparison
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 vs Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026
The Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 scores higher for control and sweet spot; the Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026 for rebound.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Tear
- Diamond
- Weight
- 365 gr
- 355 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Hard
- Medium
- Core
- EVA Medium+
- EVA Medium+
- Faces
- HES Carbon
- HES Carbon 8K
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 8.7/10
- 8.5/10
- Power
- 8.2/10
- 8.0/10
- Control
- 9.1/10
- 8.6/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.7/10
- 8.6/10
- Rebound
- 8.6/10
- 9.0/10
- Sweet spot
- 9.1/10
- 8.4/10
- Strengths
- Strong control on clean contact
- Firm net volleys, stable
- Spinny *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Fast maneuverability on exchanges
- Generous sweet spot on volleys
- Controlled *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Tradeoffs
- Small sweet spot, less forgiveness
- Needs committed swing for depth
- Lazy contact loses length
- Less raw power on finishers
- Soft feel lacks dry crispness
- Not the hardest defensive response
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 if you value control and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (control 9.1 vs 8.6, sweet spot 9.1 vs 8.4).
- Choose the Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026 if you value rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (rebound 9.0 vs 8.6).
- The Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 has a teardrop head, which usually balances power and control; the Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026 has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique.
- The Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026 has the softer touch (Medium vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
- The Oxdog Ultimate Tour X 2026 has the lighter listed weight (355 gr vs 365 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.