Racket comparison
Adidas 2026 World Cup Belgium vs Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026
Both rackets score closely in the catalogue; the specs below show where they differ.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Round
- Round
- Weight
- 360-375 Gr
- 360 - 370 gr
- Touch
- Not recorded
- Medium
- Core
- Eva Soft Performance
- Black EVA
- Faces
- Fiberglass
- 12K Carbon
- Frame
- Not recorded
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- Not recorded
- 7.6/10
- Power
- Not recorded
- 6.4/10
- Control
- Not recorded
- 8.3/10
- Manoeuvrability
- Not recorded
- 8.1/10
- Rebound
- Not recorded
- 7.4/10
- Sweet spot
- Not recorded
- 7.8/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Generous sweet spot
- Stable, clean handling
- Firm, controlled volleys
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- Not built for explosive smashes
- Needs adaptation for beginners
- Limited free attacking pop
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- The Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has the lighter listed weight (360 - 370 gr vs 360-375 Gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.
More comparisons
- Adidas 2026 World Cup Belgium vs Adidas Arrow Hit CTRL 2026
- Adidas 2026 World Cup Belgium vs Adidas Cross IT CTRL 2026
- Adidas 2026 World Cup Belgium vs Adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 2026
- Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026
- Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Adidas 2026 World Cup Argentina

