Racket comparison
Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026
Both rackets score closely in the catalogue; the specs below show where they differ.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Tear
- Round
- Weight
- 360 - 370 gr
- 360 - 370 gr
- Touch
- Medium
- Medium
- Core
- Red EVA
- Black EVA
- Faces
- 18K carbon
- 12K Carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 7.7/10
- 7.6/10
- Power
- 6.4/10
- 6.4/10
- Control
- 8.5/10
- 8.3/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 8.0/10
- 8.1/10
- Rebound
- 7.6/10
- 7.4/10
- Sweet spot
- 7.8/10
- 7.8/10
- Strengths
- Baseline control and depth
- Easy handling in transitions
- Reliable *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Generous sweet spot
- Stable, clean handling
- Firm, controlled volleys
- Tradeoffs
- Not built for violent smashes
- Needs clean contact under pressure
- Less forgiving for soft-racket users
- Not built for explosive smashes
- Needs adaptation for beginners
- Limited free attacking pop
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- The Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has a teardrop head, which usually balances power and control; the Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 has a round head, which usually keeps the balance low for control and a forgiving sweet spot.
More comparisons
- Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Fuji 2025
- Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Krakatoa 2025
- Kombat Fuji 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Kombat Osorno 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026
- Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Adidas 2026 World Cup Argentina
- Kombat Krakatoa 2.5 by Manu Martin 2026 vs Adidas 2026 World Cup Belgium

