Racket comparison
Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 vs Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025
The Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 scores higher for control, manoeuvrability and sweet spot; the Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 for power and rebound.
- Season
- 2025
- 2025
- Shape
- Round
- Diamond
- Weight
- 345 - 360 gr
- 360 - 375 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Hard
- Medium-Soft
- Core
- EVA Soft Performance
- EVA Soft Performance
- Faces
- 3K Carbon
- 6K Carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 8.4/10
- 8.4/10
- Power
- 6.4/10
- 8.4/10
- Control
- 8.9/10
- 8.1/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 9.5/10
- 7.9/10
- Rebound
- 8.1/10
- 9.7/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.9/10
- 7.8/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 if you value control, manoeuvrability and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (control 8.9 vs 8.1, manoeuvrability 9.5 vs 7.9, sweet spot 8.9 vs 7.8).
- Choose the Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 if you value power and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (power 8.4 vs 6.4, rebound 9.7 vs 8.1).
- The Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 has a round head, which usually keeps the balance low for control and a forgiving sweet spot; the Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique.
- The Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium-Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
- The Adidas Adipower Carbon Light 3.4 2025 has the lighter listed weight (345 - 360 gr vs 360 - 375 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.