Racket comparison
Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 vs Babolat Technical Veron 2025
The Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 scores higher for manoeuvrability and rebound; the Babolat Technical Veron 2025 for power, control and sweet spot.
- Season
- 2025
- 2025
- Shape
- Diamond
- Diamond
- Weight
- 360 - 375 gr
- 365 - 375 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Soft
- Medium
- Core
- EVA Soft Performance
- Black EVA
- Faces
- 6K Carbon
- Carbon Flex
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon Flex
- Catalogue rating
- 8.4/10
- 8.4/10
- Power
- 8.4/10
- 8.8/10
- Control
- 8.1/10
- 8.6/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 7.9/10
- 7.3/10
- Rebound
- 9.7/10
- 8.5/10
- Sweet spot
- 7.8/10
- 8.7/10
- Strengths
- No strengths recorded yet.
- No strengths recorded yet.
- Tradeoffs
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
- No tradeoffs recorded yet.
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 if you value manoeuvrability and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 7.9 vs 7.3, rebound 9.7 vs 8.5).
- Choose the Babolat Technical Veron 2025 if you value power, control and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (power 8.8 vs 8.4, control 8.6 vs 8.1, sweet spot 8.7 vs 7.8).
- The Adidas Metalbone Carbon 3.4 2025 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Babolat Technical Veron 2025 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.