ZARVO

Racket comparison

Head Extreme Motion 2026 vs Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026

The Head Extreme Motion 2026 scores higher for manoeuvrability; the Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 for sweet spot.

Season
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Tear
Weight
360 gr
370 gr
Touch
Medium-Hard
Hard
Core
Power FOAM
Hard EVA
Faces
Fiberglass+Carbon
HES Carbon
Frame
100% Carbon
Carbon fiber
Catalogue rating
8.6/10
8.6/10
Power
8.5/10
8.6/10
Control
9.6/10
9.5/10
Manoeuvrability
8.4/10
7.9/10
Rebound
8.1/10
8.0/10
Sweet spot
8.2/10
9.0/10
Strengths
  • Quick handling at the net
  • Firm blocking on heavy balls
  • Clean *bandeja* and *víbora*
  • Firm control on compact swings
  • Stable volleys under pressure
  • Predictable *bandeja* and *víbora*
Tradeoffs
  • Compact sweet spot
  • Defense needs active swings
  • Late contact gets punished
  • Defensive work demands extra effort
  • Little comfort on off-center hits
  • Touch shots need more hands

Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.

Which suits whom

  • Choose the Head Extreme Motion 2026 if you value manoeuvrability: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.4 vs 7.9).
  • Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 if you value sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (sweet spot 9.0 vs 8.2).
  • The Head Extreme Motion 2026 has a diamond head, which usually puts the balance higher for power on overheads but asks more of your technique; the Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 has a teardrop head, which usually balances power and control.
  • The Head Extreme Motion 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Hard vs Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
  • The Head Extreme Motion 2026 has the lighter listed weight (360 gr vs 370 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.

More comparisons