ZARVO

Racket comparison

Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026

The Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 scores higher for power and control; the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 for manoeuvrability and rebound.

Season
2026
2026
Shape
Tear
Tear
Weight
370 gr
365 gr
Touch
Hard
Medium-Hard
Core
Hard EVA
EVA Medium+
Faces
HES Carbon
HES Carbon
Frame
Carbon fiber
Carbon fiber
Catalogue rating
8.6/10
8.7/10
Power
8.6/10
8.2/10
Control
9.5/10
9.1/10
Manoeuvrability
7.9/10
8.7/10
Rebound
8.0/10
8.6/10
Sweet spot
9.0/10
9.1/10
Strengths
  • Firm control on compact swings
  • Stable volleys under pressure
  • Predictable *bandeja* and *víbora*
  • Strong control on clean contact
  • Firm net volleys, stable
  • Spinny *bandeja* and *víbora*
Tradeoffs
  • Defensive work demands extra effort
  • Little comfort on off-center hits
  • Touch shots need more hands
  • Small sweet spot, less forgiveness
  • Needs committed swing for depth
  • Lazy contact loses length

Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.

Which suits whom

  • Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 if you value power and control: its catalogue scores are higher (power 8.6 vs 8.2, control 9.5 vs 9.1).
  • Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 if you value manoeuvrability and rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (manoeuvrability 8.7 vs 7.9, rebound 8.6 vs 8.0).
  • The Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Hard vs Hard), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
  • The Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 has the lighter listed weight (365 gr vs 370 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.

More comparisons