ZARVO

Racket comparison

Royal Padel M27 Poly 2026 vs Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026

The Royal Padel M27 Poly 2026 scores higher for rebound; the Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 for power and control.

Season
2026
2026
Shape
Round
Round
Weight
360 - 380 gr
355 - 375 gr
Touch
Medium-Soft
Medium
Core
High-density polyethylene
EVA
Faces
3K Carbon
24K carbon
Frame
Carbon fiber
Carbon fiber
Catalogue rating
8.6/10
8.6/10
Power
6.9/10
7.5/10
Control
9.0/10
9.7/10
Manoeuvrability
8.6/10
8.8/10
Rebound
9.1/10
8.1/10
Sweet spot
9.2/10
9.0/10
Strengths
  • Large sweet spot forgiveness
  • Secure control from baseline
  • Comfortable arm-friendly response
  • Huge, trustworthy sweet spot
  • Stable blocks and volleys
  • Quick defensive handling
Tradeoffs
  • Limited full-smash punch
  • Needs adaptation for beginners
  • Less agile than light control rackets
  • Limited easy smash power
  • Dry feel on slower balls
  • Needs clean technique

Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.

Which suits whom

  • Choose the Royal Padel M27 Poly 2026 if you value rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (rebound 9.1 vs 8.1).
  • Choose the Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 if you value power and control: its catalogue scores are higher (power 7.5 vs 6.9, control 9.7 vs 9.0).
  • The Royal Padel M27 Poly 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.
  • The Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 has the lighter listed weight (355 - 375 gr vs 360 - 380 gr), which helps handling and arm comfort over long matches.

More comparisons