Racket comparison
Siux Gea 2 2026 vs Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026
The Siux Gea 2 2026 scores higher for rebound; the Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 for power, control, manoeuvrability and sweet spot.
- Season
- 2026
- 2026
- Shape
- Round
- Round
- Weight
- 355 - 375 gr
- 355 - 375 gr
- Touch
- Medium-Soft
- Medium
- Core
- Bio EVA
- EVA
- Faces
- Amplitex 3K
- 24K carbon
- Frame
- Carbon fiber
- Carbon fiber
- Catalogue rating
- 8.0/10
- 8.6/10
- Power
- 6.9/10
- 7.5/10
- Control
- 8.1/10
- 9.7/10
- Manoeuvrability
- 7.8/10
- 8.8/10
- Rebound
- 8.5/10
- 8.1/10
- Sweet spot
- 8.6/10
- 9.0/10
- Strengths
- Big, forgiving sweet spot
- Fast ball exit in defense
- Controlled *bandeja* and *víbora*
- Huge, trustworthy sweet spot
- Stable blocks and volleys
- Quick defensive handling
- Tradeoffs
- Little free offense
- Needs own pace on swings
- Limited bite on overheads
- Limited easy smash power
- Dry feel on slower balls
- Needs clean technique
Scores are editorial catalogue ratings out of 10 from the source reviews, not customer reviews. Prices and stock haven’t been checked.
Which suits whom
- Choose the Siux Gea 2 2026 if you value rebound: its catalogue scores are higher (rebound 8.5 vs 8.1).
- Choose the Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 if you value power, control, manoeuvrability and sweet spot: its catalogue scores are higher (power 7.5 vs 6.9, control 9.7 vs 8.1, manoeuvrability 8.8 vs 7.8, sweet spot 9.0 vs 8.6).
- The Siux Gea 2 2026 has the softer touch (Medium-Soft vs Medium), which is usually more comfortable and gives easier depth; the firmer Siux Trilogy Pro Ash Green 2026 rewards faster swings with more control at pace.